Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Simpson et al v. American International Industries et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Defendant:
Brenntag Specialties LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, American International Industries (sued individually and as successor to Pinaud, Inc., Barbara Alice, Inc., Ed. Pinaud, Inc. d/b/a Ed. Pinaud, and Nestle-Le Mur Company), all for the Clubman line of products and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Simpson, James Taylor and Lonita Deanna Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. The United States of America
as 4:2015cv00135
Petitioner:
Kelvin James Taylor
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Jones et al
as 4:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Kelvin James Taylor
Defendant:
Charles Jones, Kelvin Williams, Marcia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie et al v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
Mary Guthrie , All Plaintiffs , Telli Adamietz and others
Defendant:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company, Burlington Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Green , All Plaintiffs , Alexis Bradley and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Bechtel International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Nabors Drilling USA, LP
as 2:2011cv00234
Plaintiff:
James Taylor
Defendant:
Nabors Drilling USA, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Streeter
as 3:2011cv00215
Plaintiff:
James Taylor
Defendant:
Jesse James Streeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor et al v. Evanston Insurance Company
as 1:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
James Taylor and RBI Inspections Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
