Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Halcon v. Walmart Stores Texas, LLC Store #500
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Halcon
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Texas, LLC Store #500
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Newton v. Tejas Research & Engineering, LLC
as 4:2021cv01234
Defendant:
Tejas Research & Engineering, LLC
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Newton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jeans v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 4:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Jeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baldschun v. CABB North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Action Resources, LLC, James Andrew Wilson, CABB North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Baldschun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Baldschun v. Action Resources LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00084
Defendant:
James Andrew Wilson, Action Resources LLC and CABB North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter Baldschun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellason v. Livingston et al
as 4:2014cv03730
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dewayne Ellason
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Kyle Jordan Nash, James Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Livingston et al
as 7:2014cv00113
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Stewart
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Lonny Johnson, Kyle Jordan Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellason v. Livingston et al
as 4:2014cv01669
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dewayne Ellason
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Kyle Jordan Nash, James Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellason v. Livingston et al
as 5:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dewayne Ellason
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Kyle Jordan Nash, James Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Livingston et al
as 4:2014cv01483
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Stewart
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Lonny Johnson, Kyle Jordan Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
