Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chaney v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, Municipal Attorney's Office for the City of Oklahoma, Andrew Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney v. DRG Invest et al
as 5:2023cv00842
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
DRG Invest Owner of Property doing business as Kentucky Pines Apartment, Goldman and Assoc, Linda Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaney v. Wal-Mart Stores, et al
as 16-6255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. CHANEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES INC. and WAL-MART STORE #517
Chaney v. Brown et al
as 5:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
Jami Jo Brown and James Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chaney v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00111
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Store #517
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaney v. Brown et al
as 5:2015cv01062
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
Jami Jo Brown and James Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
