Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Lawrence (ID 78264) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2014cv03123
Petitioner:
Kelly Jay Lawrence
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holt (ID 35908) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2014cv03063
Petitioner:
Stanton S. Holt
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell (ID 78997) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2014cv03056
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Bell
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Engelhardt v. Heimgartner, et al
as 14-3040
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT J. ENGELHARDT
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Pruitt (ID 46934) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03202
Petitioner:
Ronald Joel Pruitt
Respondent:
James Heimgartner, Mary Nelson and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Romero (ID 63334) v. Heimgartner et al.
as 5:2013cv03189
Petitioner:
Christopher Edward Romero
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03161
Petitioner:
Wallace L. Dixon, III
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero (ID 63334) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03139
Petitioner:
Christopher Edward Romero
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glynn v. Heimgartner, et al
as 13-3154
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICO L. GLYNN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Glynn v. Heimgartner, et al
as 13-3155
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICO L. GLYNN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
