Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Boreago et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Corey Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Boreago, L. Rodriguez, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chad William Jimenez v. James Hill
as 2:2023cv10879
Petitioner:
Chad William Jimenez
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jesse Lee Sykes v. James Hill
as 2:2023cv10914
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Sykes
Respondent:
Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melody v. Hill
as 3:2023cv06210
Defendant:
sean melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Melody et al
as 3:2023mc80308
Defendant:
Sean Melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ochoa v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Ochoa
Defendant:
James Hill, Dr. John Hodges, Dr. Luzviminda Saidro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Jenkins v. James Hill
as 2:2023cv09325
Petitioner:
Larry Jenkins
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aurelio Martin Sepulveda v. James Hill
as 5:2023cv02195
Petitioner:
Aurelio Martin Sepulveda
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Allison et al
as 3:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Williams
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Gavin Newsom, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
