Cases filed in Pennsylvania
FONT et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv05838
Plaintiff: ADELL FONT , ALEXANDER FUENTES , STEVEN GALL and others
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HOWELL v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67698
Plaintiff: JAMES HOWELL
Defendant: AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv63742
Plaintiff: MABLE E. SMITH and JAMES HOWELL SMITH
Defendant: AC AND S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. A.P. SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88052
Plaintiff: JAMES HOWELL SMITH and MABLE SMITH
Defendant: A.P. SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SMITH et al v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv86898
Plaintiff: JAMES HOWELL SMITH and MABLE E. SMITH
Defendant: U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SMITH et al v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv89413
Plaintiff: MABLE E. SMITH and JAMES HOWELL SMITH
Defendant: A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BUDDIN, JR v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2008cv79842
Plaintiff: JAMES HOWELL BUDDIN, JR
Defendant: AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
HARTWELL v. HANDY et al
as 2:2008cv00058
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY HARTWELL
Defendant: COREY HANDY, UNKNOWN DEA AGENTS, PETER KATZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?