Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jackson, Jr. v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Donnie James Jackson, Jr., Ben-Shalom Israel and Ben-Shalom Yisrael-Benyahweh
Defendant:
Dixon, Senior Chaplian, Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, Jr. v. FDC et al
as 3:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Donnie James Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
FDC, Secretary Dixon and Senior Chaplian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. FDC et al
as 3:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
Donnie James Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
FDC, Secretary, FSP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, Jr. v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Donnie James Jackson, Jr. and Ben-Shalom Yisrael-Benyahweh
Defendant:
Wheeler, Elee, Butterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. JOSEPH
as 3:2022cv02099
Petitioner:
JAMES JACKSON
Respondent:
M V JOSEPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2019cv03152
Petitioner:
James Jackson
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections et al (Duval County)
as 3:2019cv00449
Respondent:
Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Howard James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00106
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
JACKSON v. HOLLIS
as 5:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JAMES JACKSON
Defendant:
QUINTON HOLLIS, H GUY GREEN and JEANIE HOOPPELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2016cv00273
Petitioner:
CURTIS JAMES JACKSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
