Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mike Redford v. U.S. District Court, Northern, et al
as 21-10093
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ELEANOR L. ROSS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE REDFORD
Mike Redford v. United States District Court, et al
as 19-14308
Defendant / Appellee:
TIA C HULTON, SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE REDFORD
Williams v. Bharara
as 19-248
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Fuqua, Receiver, James N. Hatten, Clerk of Court, GA, Marcela C. Mateo and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John T. Williams
Williams v. Bharara
as 19-247
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Fuqua, Receiver, James N. Hatten, Clerk of Court, GA, Marcela C. Mateo, FTC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John T. Williams
In re: Joseph Dingler
as 17-14393
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH DINGLER
Mandamus Respondent:
JAMES N. HATTEN, U.S. Dustrict Court, Clerk, JUSTIN S. ANAND, U.S. District Court, AMY TOTENBERG, U.S. District Court and others
Windsor v. Thrash et al
as 1:2011cv02027
Defendant:
Thomas Woodrow Thrash , Christopher Huber , William S. Duffey and others
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donald Jones v. United States Supreme Court, et al
as 10-5222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, William K. Suter, US Supreme Court Clerk of Court, Gail Johnson, US Supreme Court and others
Skillern v. Hatten et al
as 1:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
Warren Skillern
Defendant:
James N. Hatten and U. S. Marshall's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Moore v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Cobb County, City of Marietta, Georgia, James N Hatten and others
Price v. Hatten
as 1:2008cv02348
Plaintiff:
Elton Brent Price
Defendant:
James N. Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
