Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PIERCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22202
Plaintiff:
JAMES PIERCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIERCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv06026
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15407
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78768
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13227
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE JAMES PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prosperous v. Todd et al
as 8:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Prosperous
Defendant:
Kimberly Todd, Sherwood Coleman, James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prosperous v. Todd et al
as 8:2017cv00996
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Love Prosperous
Defendant:
Kimberly Todd , Jack Hellinger , James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarado v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv22788
Plaintiff:
Louis Alvarado , James Anson , Alden Barnett and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
