Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Pemberton v. Patton, et al
as 15-6129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. PATTON, New Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections Substitute, in his official capacity, MARY FALLIN, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, in her official capacity only, JUSTIN JONES, Individuall and as Past Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Pemberton v. Patton, et al
as 15-6089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. PATTON, New Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections Substitute, in his official capacity, MARY FALLIN, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, in her official capacity only, JUSTIN JONES, Individuall and as Past Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and others
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, CARL BEAR, Warden's Assistant and others
Stachmus v. Rudek
as 14-7092
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ERICK STACHMUS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden
Marshall v. Rudek
as 14-5064
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY G. MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden
McGee v. Rudek
as 14-6056
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT WAYNE MCGEE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden
Pemberton v. Patton et al
as 5:2014cv00129
Plaintiff:
Paul Curtis Pemberton
Defendant:
Robert C Patton, Justin Jones, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Rudek
as 5:2013cv01231
Petitioner:
Mark Stephen Anderson
Respondent:
James Rudek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Rudek
as 13-5116
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY GENE MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
