Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Uhler et al
as 9:2015cv00334
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Uhler and Eric T. Schneiderman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Dell v. The Attorney General's Office et al
as 9:2013cv00635
Plaintiff:
George O'Dell
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman and James Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towner v. Schuster et al
as 9:2012cv01111
Plaintiff:
James William Towner
Defendant:
Michael E. Schuster, Sandeep Bagia, Mitchell A. Chess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towner v. NYS Dept of Corrections et al
as 9:2008cv00454
Plaintiff:
James William Towner
Defendant:
NYS Dept of Corrections, Weisman and APS Albany Medical Review Board
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00384
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Towner v. Woods et al
as 9:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
James William Towner
Defendant:
R. Woods, A. Boucaud, NYSDOCS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towner v. River et al
as 9:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
James William Towner
Defendant:
I. River, John Doe and V. Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towner v. Lape et al
as 9:2008cv00047
Plaintiff:
James William Towner
Defendant:
Lape, John Doe, B. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towner v. Doe et al
as 9:2007cv01343
Plaintiff:
James William Towner
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and Jon Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services et al
as 9:2007cv00296
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services and Attorney General of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
