Cases 1 - 10 of 500
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
RAY v. PRIVER et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
AMES RAY
Defendant:
DONALD PRIVER, JON LAWSON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EMMANUEL AGBARA, INNOCENT OPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ISOM v. NELSON
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
JANE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DOE v. CHRIST CHURCH GEORGETOWN et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Christ Church Georgetown and Timothy Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
HALLEY et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
ETHAN KESSLER HALLEY, ADAM FISCHER HALLEY, WENDY KESSLER HALLEY and others
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, RICHARD VERMA, TAMARA COFMAN WITTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
