Contract Cases filed in Pennsylvania
PRESBERY et al v. THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv05074
Defendant: THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION, PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES #1-10
Plaintiff: KEVIN PRESBERY and SADIRAH HILL MAJETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
DOUGLAS v. RS-WERKS AUTOMOTIVE SHOP LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03304
Plaintiff: Christian Douglas
Defendant: RS-WERKS Automotive Shop LLC doing business as RS-Werks, Nicholas Dunlop, Michael Meldrum and others
Cause Of Action: 73 U.S.C. § 201 Violation of the Pennsylvania Consumer Fraud Act, and all other Acts in the United States
North Park Family Dental
as 2:2021cv03728
Lead Plaintiff: North Park Family Dental
Defendant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY doing business as METLIFE and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Plaintiff: MICHELLE F. KLINE, D.M.D.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
EDWARDS v. SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv02298
Defendant: JOHN DOE COMPANIES 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10, SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. and others
Plaintiff: KHADEEJAH EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REILLY FOAM CORPORATION v. TRODAT USA, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01204
Plaintiff: REILLY FOAM CORPORATION
Defendant: TRODAT USA, LLC, M&R MARKING SYSTEMS, INC., M&R MARKING SYSTEMS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IAAS Worldwide, LLC v. Monroe et al
as 1:2011cv01772
Plaintiff: IAAS Worldwide, LLC
Defendant: Dean Monroe, Monroe Enterprises, Inc., Michael Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE ARDEN GROUP, INC. et al v. HOFFMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03193
Plaintiff: THE ARDEN GROUP, INC. and CRAIG SPENCER
Defendant: CAMILLE O. HOFFMAN, RESORT VENTURES, LLC, STONEHILL CAPITAL PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?