Cases 21 - 30 of 63
DOE 1 et al v. APPLE INC. et al
as 1:2019cv03737
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC., TESLA, INC., APPLE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 1, JENNA ROE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CADMUS v. CHECKR, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv03459
Defendant:
CHECKR, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
RICHARD R. CADMUS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARDY et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00051
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 3 and others
Defendant:
ELAINE L. CHAO, SONNY PURDUE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
JOHNSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2018cv03062
Defendant:
BARRY FREUNDELL, JIMMIE ALLEN, JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
DUANE JOSEPH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KEYNES v. DOES 1 TO 100 et al
as 1:2018cv01572
Defendant:
DOES 1 TO 100, John Doe Entities 1-10, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Plaintiff:
David Keynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEGLITZ et al v. BARRY et al
as 1:2018cv01555
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, James Barry, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Steglitz and Laura Bry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO v. HUDSON
as 1:2018cv01230
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
EUGENE HUDSON, JR. , DANA DUGGINS and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
