Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Castro v. Wallace
as 21-50909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hubert Edward Castro
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden Darren Wallace, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Assistant Warden Toby Powell, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Chimdi Akwitti and others
Baylor UniversityIn re: Baylor University
as 21-50386
Respondent:
Jane Doe 14, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 11 and others
Petitioner:
In re: Baylor University
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 1:2018mc00647
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 6:2018mc00219
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
In re: Baylor University
as 17-50988
Petitioner:
In re: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
Respondent:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3 and others
In re: USA, et al
as 16-40795
Petitioner:
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Respondent:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-40796
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-40333
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Movant - Appellant:
JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
