Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Saiyed v. Archon, Inc.
as 21-2298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMJAD SAIYED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCHON, INC., ARCHON DISTRIBUTION, INC., RASHID PATEL and others
Simmons v. Spearman
as 20-1227
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION E. SPEARMAN, RALPH DIAZ, DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS
Simmons v. Spearman
as 20-1168
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION E. SPEARMAN, RALPH DIAZ, DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS
Alford v. US
as 19-1678
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES LUKE, RONALD WILSON, TROY ALFORD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
HOWELL et al v. USA
as 1:2016cv00316
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE ELIZABETH ANNE HOWELL, BRIAN PAUL HOWELL, JANE DOE(S) and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
DOE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00129
Petitioner:
JANE DOE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
JOHN DOE 1-5 et al v. USA
as 1:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1-5 and JANE DOE 1-4
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
CLARK V US
as 11-5003
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Carol Risser, James P. Davern, Jane Does 1-3 and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States, United States, United States and others
DOE V HHS
as 09-5096
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Child Doe, 11 (Deceased), Jane Doe, 11 (as Representative of Estate of Child Doe 11) and John Doe, 11 (As Representative of Estate of Child Doe 11)
Defendant-Appellee:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
DOE V US
as 07-5107
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
