Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
as 24-5077
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center and others
HALE EL v. MARTINEZ-THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv03114
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
MICHELLE MARTINEZ-THOMAS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COLORADO and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIORITO v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FIORITO
Defendant:
COLLETTE PETERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOURNING v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LEE MOURNING
Defendant:
JOHN BROWN, HANS FRANK, MILDRED SUSAN BATEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Shumpert v. Keith Sorrell, et al
as 23-5047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald L. Shumpert
Defendant / Appellee:
Keith D. Sorrell and Jane Doe
SHUMPERT v. SORRELL et al
as 1:2022cv03500
Plaintiff:
REGINALD L. SHUMPERT
Defendant:
KEITH D. SORRELL and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOWNING v. SISOLAK et al
as 1:2022cv02426
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. DOWNING
Defendant:
STEVE SISOLAK and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Wattleton v. BOP
as 22-5180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John or Jane Doe, Director
FAGAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
MELVIN FAGAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL D. CARVAJAL, ALAN BAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams, et al
as 22-5056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
