Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
CONNELLY et al v. GREEN et al
as 5:2022cv01163
Defendant: COUNTY OF BERKS, JAMES GREEN, MATTHEW TRUSCOTT and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS P. CONNELLY, JR. and EMMA LYNNE DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TRAVIS v. v. STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv05395
Plaintiff: KRISTINA TRAVIS
Defendant: STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, MILBANK INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
NWL, INC. v. BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02637
Plaintiff: NWL, INC.
Defendant: BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. , AMK CONCEPTS AND SERVICES, INC. , DANIEL J. KIRK and others
Cross_claimant: AMK CONCEPTS AND SERVICES, INC.
Cross_defendant: ABC BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-10, BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. , DANIEL J. KIRK & ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
FAGAN et al v. PELAYO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv05902
Plaintiff: PERRY FAGAN and GET STRATEGY, LLC
Defendant: CHARINA ANN R. PELAYO, JOHN DOES (1-10), JANE DOES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
HA GAON LLC v. INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00295
Plaintiff: HA GAON LLC
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO INC., RICHARD SHUSTERMAN, KAREN LYNN SHUSTERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DONATELLI v. BURTON NEIL & ASSOCIATES PC et al
as 2:2008cv00711
Plaintiff: DELORES DONATELLI
Defendant: BURTON NEIL & ASSOCIATES PC and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WOLFRAM v. OUTSOURCING SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03799
Plaintiff: JULIE WOLFRAM
Defendant: OUTSOURCING SOLUTIONS, INC., APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?