Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 24-3465
Plaintiff:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 23-2852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, Guardian Ad Litem Tiffany Starcevich
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Kennard Davis, et al v. James Walker, et al
as 19-16616
Defendant:
TROY BRIMHALL, V, DUC, R. PENNINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BROWN, Guardian Ad Litem for Kennard Lee Davis and RONNIE TOLLIVER, Guardian Ad Litem for Kennard Lee Davis
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, guardian ad litem Ronnie Tolliver
Defendant / Appellee:
DA ROSA, EDMONSON, S. FLORY and others
Floyd Perryman v. Jasdeep Bal
as 16-16705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD PERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JASDEEP BAL, Chief Medical Officer, CSP - Sacramento
Perryman v. Bal
as 2:2014cv00680
Plaintiff:
Floyd Perryman
Defendant:
Jasdeep Bal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Senator v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv00810
Plaintiff:
Bruce R. Senator
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Robin Dezember, Elvin Valenzuela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton Wagner v. Moss Posner, et al
as 12-16623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON F. WAGNER
Defendant - Appellee:
MOSS D. POSNER, M.D., CALVIN SCHUSTER, M.D., O'BRIEN, Dr. and others
Clinton Wagner v. Moss Posner, et al
as 12-16055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON F. WAGNER
Defendant - Appellee:
MOSS D. POSNER, M.D., CALVIN SCHUSTER, M.D., O'BRIEN, Dr. and others
Clinton Wagner v. Moss Posner, et al
as 12-15925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON F. WAGNER
Defendant - Appellee:
MOSS D. POSNER, M.D., CALVIN SCHUSTER, M.D., O'BRIEN, Dr. and others
Marcus Hudson v. Andrew Nangalama, et al
as 12-15883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS L. HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW NANGALAMA, M.D. and JASDEEP BAL, Chief Medical Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
