Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Goodrick v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Bree Derrick, Ross Castleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Cherry v. Dewayne Shedd, et al
as 16-35921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN A. CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEWAYNE SHEDD, JEFF KIRKMAN, RANDY HIGGINS and others
Hogan v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
James Hogan
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Debra Field, David McClusky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dick v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dick
Defendant:
Kevin Kempf, Sheriff of Canyon County, Sheriff of Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan et al v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Hogan and Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Kevin Kempf, Jeff Zmuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
David Morgan
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Brent Reinke, Kevin Kempf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kirkman
as 4:2014cv00395
Petitioner:
Sarah Marie Johnson
Respondent:
Jeff Kirkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plant v. Ibarra et al
as 1:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Plant
Defendant:
Jaun Ibarra, Kessler, Grady Zikefoose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Plant v. Jeff Kirkman, et al
as 14-35327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY L. PLANT
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF KIRKMAN, JANN IBARRA, GRADY ZIKEFOOSE and others
William Gray v. Jeff Kirkman, et al
as 14-35158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF KIRKMAN, IDOC Access to Courts Coordinator, NOEL BARLOW-HUST, Deputy Warden of Operations, ICI-O, LAURA ASHFORD, Paralegal and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
