Cases 41 - 50 of 182
John E. Colbert v. Beard et al
as 1:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
John E. Colbert
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Paul D. Brazelton, Edmund Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otis Hart v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 17-55335
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS HART
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of the CDCR and CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER
Michael Lena v. People of the State of Califor, et al
as 17-15249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANGELO LENA
Defendant - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Former Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, K. HOLLAND, Former Warden at California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi and others
Lee Edward Peyton v. Jeffrey A. Beard
as 2:2016cv09552
Respondent:
Jeffrey A. Beard
Petitioner:
Lee Edward Peyton
Armando Garcia v. Jeffrey Beard
as 16-56847
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARMANDO GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Dannie Farnum v. Jeffrey Beard
as 16-56719
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNIE JOE FARNUM
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Steven Farlow v. Jeffrey Beard
as 16-56702
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN FARLOW
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of Corrections
Allred v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv01571
Plaintiff:
Jesse D. Allred
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Car Services, Valley State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex Sashin v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 16-56541
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALEX SASHIN
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
Terrell Cooks v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 16-56439
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRELL COOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD and J. SOTO, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
