Cases 41 - 50 of 479
John Yun v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-56234
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN LEE YUN
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Joe Nino v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-56126
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE QUSTA NINO
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Gerardo Cuevas v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-16549
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERARDO CUEVAS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary
Cruz Gutierrez v. Clark Ducart, et al
as 17-56015
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRUZ ALONZO GUTIERREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden and JEFFREY A. BEARD
Michael Lena v. People of the State of CA, et al
as 17-16367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANGELO LENA
Defendant - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Former Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, K. HOLLAND, Former Warden at California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi and others
Jerry Dillingham v. T. Johnson, et al
as 17-16288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY DILLINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
T. JOHNSON, C/O, D. MOON, C/O, E. HOWARD, Sgt. and others
Richard Crane v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-55862
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Larry Giraldes, Jr. v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-16144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY GIRALDES, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections
David Mills v. Mark Bowen, et al
as 17-15989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RAY MILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK BOWEN, Warden, LE YOUNG, Doctor at Central Valley MCCF, GEO CORRECTIONS and others
William MacDonald v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-15941
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM TERRY MACDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, as Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
