Cases 51 - 60 of 479
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 17-55650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, ALVAREZ, Correctional Counselor I, Ironwood B3 Facility, NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Warden and others
Kevin Brazier v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 17-15898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN DEON BRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, KATHLEEN DICKINSON, K. HOLLAND and others
Michael Fries v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 17-55585
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ACHILLES FRIES
Respondent - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, SCOTT KERNAN, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
John E. Colbert v. Beard et al
as 1:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
John E. Colbert
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Paul D. Brazelton, Edmund Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Otis Hart v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 17-55335
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS HART
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of the CDCR and CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER
Michael Lena v. People of the State of Califor, et al
as 17-15249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANGELO LENA
Defendant - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Former Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, K. HOLLAND, Former Warden at California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi and others
Lee Edward Peyton v. Jeffrey A. Beard
as 2:2016cv09552
Respondent:
Jeffrey A. Beard
Petitioner:
Lee Edward Peyton
Armando Garcia v. Jeffrey Beard
as 16-56847
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARMANDO GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Dannie Farnum v. Jeffrey Beard
as 16-56719
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNIE JOE FARNUM
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Steven Farlow v. Jeffrey Beard
as 16-56702
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN FARLOW
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
