Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02105
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01606
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03301
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Cadle Company v. Jeffrey Mims, et al
as 09-10604
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: JAMES H. MOORE, III
Appellant:
CADLE CO
Appellee:
JEFFREY H MIMS, JAMES H. MOORE, III, ELIZABETH A. MOORE and others
Brunswick Homes LLC, et al v. Mims
as 08-41186
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: HORSESHOE NAIL RANCH LP
Appellee:
BRUNSWICK HOMES LLC
Appellant:
JEFFREY H MIMS, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of James H Moore III
Mims v. Brunswick Homes LLC
as 08-41173
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: HORSESHOE NAIL RANCH LP
Appellant:
JEFFREY H MIMS, CH-7 Trustee for the Estate of James H Moore III
Appellee:
BRUNSWICK HOMES LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
