Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Torre v. Hastings et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Jennifer de la Torre and Jennifer Mason
Defendant:
Andrea Hastings and Hastings Shadmehry, LLC
Warren et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Karon Warren, Deborah Kaplan, Kimberly Kavin and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Julie Su, Administrator Jessica Looman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Deveny et al v. Love Bugs Pet Sitting et al
as 1:2022cv02058
Plaintiff:
Deborah Deveny and Jennifer Flannery
Defendant:
Love Bugs Pet Sitting, Cassandra Smrekar, Megan Smekar Williams and others
Roland v. Extremely Clean Floor Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Roland
Defendant:
Extremely Clean Floor Services, Inc. and Southern Maintenance Services, Inc.
Yardley v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cathryn Yardley
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Stallard v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02257
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stallard
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Ray et al v. Fannie's, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00864
Plaintiff:
Fancy Mitcham, Jennifer Lynn Ray and Deborah Ringo
Defendant:
Fannie's a Georgia Corporation doing business as Fannie's Cabaret, Rick Peffer, Michael W Fulton and others
Williams v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2020cv03852
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Williams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Montgomery et al v. International Follies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03844
Plaintiff:
Korey Montgomery and Jennifer Jackson
Defendant:
International Follies, Inc. doing business as Cheetah and Jack Braglia
Young v. Ray of Hope Counseling Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03684
Defendant:
Jennifer Lynn Thompson, Ray of Hope Counseling Services, Inc., Kevin Umstead and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Young
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
