Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Casimir et al v. Horseshoe Hammond LLC et al
as 1:2015cv08027
Plaintiff:
Jerome J Casimir and Betty J. Dumas
Defendant:
Horseshoe Hammond LLC, James Horseshoe Manager Last Name Unknown and CAESARS PALACE CORP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Casimir et al v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2015cv04722
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. Casimir and Betty J. Dumas
Defendant:
Illinois State Police and C. Iverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casimir v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv03771
Plaintiff:
Jerome J Casimir
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, The City of Chicago Department of Administrative Hearings, Patricia Jackowiak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Casimir et al v. Romanski et al
as 1:2013cv08774
Plaintiff:
Jerome J Casimir and Betty J Dumas-Casimir
Defendant:
Stephen Romanski, Martin Philbin, Michael Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betty Dumas, et al v. Charles Decker, et al
as 12-2505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY J. DUMAS and JEROME J. CASIMIR
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES DECKER, KENNETH R. ROCHMAN, SABRE GROUP, LLC and others
Dumas et al v. Decker et al
as 1:2010cv07684
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Dumas and Jerome J. Casimir
Defendant:
Charles Decker, Kenneth R Rochman, Sabre Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dumas et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv00774
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Dumas and Jerome J. Casimir
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, The City of Chicago Department of Buildings and The Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Casimir et al v. The Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv06704
Plaintiff:
Jerome J Casimir and Betty J. Dumas
Defendant:
The Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, The City of Chicago, The City of Chicago Department of Buildings and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
