Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BROWN v. ALVES
as 1:2009cv02329
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
KRYSTAL QUINN ALVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION et al
as 1:2009cv02260
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION and JOSEPH H. HENSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SER. CENTER et al
as 1:2009cv02261
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SER. CENTER and ELAINE GARRISON-DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. MCCARTHY
as 1:2009cv02074
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
BRENNAN C. MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL
as 1:2009cv02035
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERTO L. HYLTON and MRS. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. SUBURBAN PROPANE, LP
as 1:2009cv02012
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
SUBURBAN PROPANE, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BROWN v. CHEVY CHASE BANK et al
as 1:2009cv01899
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
CHEVY CHASE BANK and JAMES WADE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. MILLER
as 1:2009cv01892
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
JERRY D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN,
as 1:2009cv01639
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
BARADEL,KOSMERL & NOLAN and EDWIN H. STAPLES, ll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
