Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Zemke v. Central Washington Asphalt, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01475
Defendant:
Central Washington Asphalt, Inc., Jerry Goldsmith, Donald Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Zemke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Law, et al. v. Central Washington Asphalt, Inc., et al.
as 2:2012cv01435
Defendant:
Central Washington Asphalt, Inc., Jerry Goldsmith, Donald Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Doreen Lea Law and Phillip Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
NOT USED
as 2:2012cv01429
Defendant:
Central Washington Asphalt, Inc., Jerry Goldsmith, Donald Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Doreen Lea Law and Phillip Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Goldsmith v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2011cv04399
Plaintiff:
Jerry Goldsmith
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and The Bank of New York
Deborah Getz, et al v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 10-15284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBORAH GETZ, individually and as a surviving heir of decedent Kristofer D.S. Thomas, RODNEY THOMAS, individually and as surviving heir of decedent, Kristopher D.S. Thomas, MARY DUFFMAN, individually and as a surviving heir of decedent, Scott E. Duffman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BOEING COMPANY, a corporation, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL , INC., a corporation, GOODRICH PUMP AND ENGINE CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC., a corporation and others
Getz et al v. Boeing Company, The et al
as 3:2007cv06396
Plaintiff:
Deborah Getz, Deborah Getz, Deborah Getz and others
Defendant:
Boeing Company, The, Boeing Company, The, Boeing Company, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Getz et al v. Boeing Company, The et al
as 4:2007cv06396
Plaintiff:
Deborah Getz, Deborah Getz, Deborah Getz and others
Defendant:
Boeing Company, The, Boeing Company, The, Boeing Company, The and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
