Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Huyck v. Schilling-Devaney et al
as 3:2018cv00400
Plaintiff:
Karen Huyck
Defendant:
Sherrie Schilling-Devaney and Sherrie's Jewelry Box Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Assorted Personal Property, Coins, Jewelry, Accessories and Other Things of Value
as 3:2015cv01221
Defendant:
Assorted Personal Property, Coins, Jewelry, Accessories and Other Things of Value
Interested Party:
Andrew Rich
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $43,500.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2013cv00535
Defendant:
$2,971.00 in United States Currency, $33,342.00 in United States Currency, $43,500.00 in United States Currency and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Miscellaeneous personal property et al
as 3:2012cv00050
Defendant:
Miscellaeneous personal property and Miscellaenous jewelry
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $120,420.00 in United States Currency and Assorted Coins and Jewelry, ( Further Described in Exhibit 1 ) in rem
as 3:2011cv01240
Defendant:
$120,420.00 in United States Currency and Assorted Coins and Jewelry, ( Further Described in Exhibit 1 ) in rem
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Miscellaneous Jewelry et al
as 3:2011cv00742
Defendant:
(8) Assorted Firearms and Miscellaneous Jewelry
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Calhoun v. USA Pawn & Jewelry Co. I-Oregon, LLC
as 3:2010cv01046
Plaintiff:
Thomas Calhoun
Defendant:
USA Pawn & Jewelry Co. I-Oregon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
