Cases 1 - 10 of 386
MW Gestion v. Global Cord Blood Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
MW Gestion
Defendant:
Global Cord Blood Corporation, Ting Zheng, Bing Chuen (Albert) Chen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
L & J Produce, Inc. v. SeasonFresh Supermarket of NY Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Defendant:
Jerry Wang, SeasonFresh Supermarket of NY Inc., SeasonFresh Supermarket Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
L & J Produce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nike, Inc. et al v. www.perfectkicks.me et al
as 1:2021cv00248
Defendant:
www.airjordan1og.com, www.perfectkicks.me, www.fyysports.co and others
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc. and Converse Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
