Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ramirez v. Maduekwe et al
as 1:2019cv02119
Defendant:
Judge Amondo Montano, Legal Aid Society, Jeffery Kimmelman and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11949
Plaintiff:
Karem Rodriguez, Kevin Robinson, Theodore Rusnack and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Ramirez et al v. Riker's Island Slave Complex et al
as 1:2018cv09260
Defendant:
Lawerance Marks, Michael Pompeo, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Douglas Wells, Eugene Moore, Terrence D. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Warden
as 1:2018cv06610
Petitioner:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Ramirez v. Grasso et al
as 1:2018cv06612
Respondent:
Jorge DoPico, Bronx Supreme Court, Jeffrey M. Kimelman and others
Petitioner:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Bloom et al
as 1:2018cv06609
Defendant:
George Villegas, Willoughby C. Jenett, Tajuana B. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Bloom et al
as 1:2018cv06203
Defendant:
Jeffrey Kimmelman, Tajuana B. Johnson, Judge Montano and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Goede et al
as 1:2018cv04040
Plaintiff:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Defendant:
Goede, New York City Department of Corrections, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Lewis et al
as 1:2018cv03486
Plaintiff:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Defendant:
Lewis, New York City Department of Corrections and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez et al v. New York City/Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv10171
Plaintiff:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez and Eugene Moore
Defendant:
New York City/Department of Corrections, John Gianne, Ms. Eps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
