Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Waby et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Bouabid Waby, MFN Wahby Inc. d/b/a GI Joes and MFN Wahby Inc. doing business as GI Joes
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Valverde et al.
as 1:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Carlos Valverde and Shark II Inc. doing business as Shark Peruvian Cuisine
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Theft of cable services
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v Harris Bar & Grille Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Harris Bar & Grille, Inc. and Dennis Colicchio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Marrocco et al
as 1:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Gianfranco Marrocco and The Rack, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Pate et al
as 1:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Christina Pate, Michael Pate and MVP Sports Pub & Restaurant, LTD
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Santiago v. Loflin, Jr et al
as 1:2008mc00039
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Santiago
Defendant:
Billy Joe Loflin, Jr and Swift Transportation Company, Inc.
Becker v. Warden Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jan Becker
Defendant:
Warden Hudson, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jack Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
