Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Inman v. Dumont et al
as 1:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Michael Dumont and Linden Hotel Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joe Inman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carter v. Joe Haas Construction & AWS, LLC
as 3:2020cv00409
Plaintiff:
Austin Carter
Defendant:
Joe Haas Construction & AWS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bastian et al v. Nova Vapors, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Caleb Bastian and Corey Vayens
Defendant:
Nova Vapors, LLC and Buckley Joe Pepper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Paige Acklin , Steve Acuff , Michael L. Adkison and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Taylor v. Sweeden Agriculture Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02619
Plaintiff:
Joe Wade Taylor
Defendant:
Sweeden Agriculture Inc., Mapco Express, Shoney's Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pace v. Clarksville Health System G.P.
as 3:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Pace
Defendant:
Clarksville Health System G.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Operating Engineers Local No. 474 Health and Welfare Fund v. Gay et al
as 3:2014cv01272
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local No. 474 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Joe W. Gay and Johnnie F. Gay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cottingham v. Renal Advantage, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01227
Plaintiff:
Joe Cottingham
Defendant:
Renal Advantage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bodo v. Prime Home Entertainment, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00399
Plaintiff:
Joe Bodo
Defendant:
Prime Home Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scott et al v. The Synergy Group, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Todd Scott and Duane Charlton
Defendant:
The Synergy Group, LLC, Terri Hammerly and Joe Santoro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
