Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. ESCOBOZA et al
as 2:2022cv06147
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
KENNETH ESCOBOZA and FANATIX CIGAR LOUNGE LTD
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. NKWEPO et al
as 2:2021cv13926
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
EDDY NKWEPO and KILIMANJARO INTERNATIONAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. NKWEPO et al
as 3:2021cv13926
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
EDDY NKWEPO and KILIMANJARO INTERNATIONAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. JARAMILLO et al
as 2:2020cv01568
Defendant:
DIANA M JARAMILLO and MR PAN RESTAURANT & BAKERY CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. ROSARIO et al
as 2:2019cv16308
Defendant:
RDLC Services LLC, RAMON ROSARIO and Kachimbo Barber Shop
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. MATA
as 2:2019cv12740
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
EGAL MATA
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. EDSCO INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv12750
Defendant:
EDSCO INCORPORATED and JACOB VANKAMPEN
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. SWEDESBORO CIGARS LLC et al
as 1:2018cv14283
Defendant:
ANTHONY DIDONATO and SWEDESBORO CIGARS LLC
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. SHARPERSON et al
as 2:2018cv12388
Defendant:
MERVEL CORP. and ANTHONY SHARPERSON
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. ABUAWAD et al
as 2:2018cv11426
Defendant:
FADI ABUAWAD and FADI'S CAFE, LLC
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
