Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Moss et al
as 7:2010cv01256
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
John B Moss and Copper Top, The
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Chamnong et al
as 2:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sekson Chamnong and CAP-BS-2 L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Siragusa
as 2:2010cv00421
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc and Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Frank Siragusa
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Duggan et al
as 2:2009cv00791
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Eric Duggan and Eastside Grille
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Blackwell et al
as 2:2009cv00494
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Blackwell and Blackwell Igor's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Porterfield et al
as 3:2009cv00493
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Danny Ray Porterfield, Susan P. Porterfield and Porterfield Enterprises, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
v. Olson et al
as 1:2009cv00292
Defendant:
Sally Olson, Karen Olson, Larry Fransen and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Cause Of Action: Communications Act of 1934
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Pfau et al
as 1:2007cv00702
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
John Pfau and MVP Sports Lounge
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Cable Communications Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Levine
as 2:2007cv01068
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc and Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Kathy Levine
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
