Cases 11 - 20 of 29
In re: John Glenn, Jr.
as 19-3079
Not Yet Classified:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and In re: JOHN D. GLENN, JR.
In re: Terrance Brown
as 18-1860
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
KEVIN KAUFFMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
Nominal Respondent:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY
In re: Lei Ke
as 17-2154
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: LEI KE
Defendant - Respondent:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY, JOHN FRY, RICHARD HOMAN and others
Nominal Respondent:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY
Alton Brown v. Gary Lancaster, et al
as 17-1620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, MICHAEL KUNZ and others
Debtor - Appellee:
THOMAS J. RUETER
In re: Alton D. Brown, et al
as 16-2749
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
In re: Alexander Brown
as 15-3710
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALEXANDER BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MOORE, Sgt. and others
Nominal Respondent:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY
In re: Alexander Brown
as 15-2934
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALEXANDER BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES, Officer and others
Debtor - Respondent:
CHAMPION, Detention Officer
Nominal Respondent:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY
In re: Alexander Brown
as 15-2008
Petitioner:
In re: ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY and CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Alton Brown, et al
as 15-1616
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
Banks v. Fitzgerald et al
as 5:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Rich Fitzgerald, Harper, Landya McCafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
