Cases
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Banks v. McCafferty et al
as 1:2014cv01234
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Landya McCafferty, Joseph N. Laplante, Steven J. McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
In re: Alexander Brown v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 14-3341
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: ALEXANDER BROWN
Defendant - Respondent: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MOORE, SGT. and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
In re: Lei Ke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1823
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: LEI KE
Defendant - Respondent: DREXEL UNIVERSITY, JOHN FRY, RICHARD HOMAN and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
USA v. Nezzy Adderly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1416
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: NEZZY ADDERLY
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
In re: Lei Ke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3804
Petitioner: In re: LEI KE
Respondent: DREXEL UNIVERSITY, JOHN FRY, RICHARD HOMAN and others
Nominal Respondent: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
In re: Nezzy Adderly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2176
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: NEZZY ADDERLY
Defendant - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
In re: Lei Ke, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1364
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: LEI KE
Defendant - Respondent: DREXEL UNIV, JOHN FRY, RICHARD HOMAN and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
In re: Nezzy Adderly
as 11-3921
Petitioner: In re: NEZZY ADDERLY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
In re: Peter G. Mylonas, et al
as 11-3757
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: PETER G. MYLONAS and PETER G. MYLONAS, Esq.
Plaintiff: ANASTASIOS PAPADOPOULOUS
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: JOEL H. SLOMSKY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?