Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MOURNING v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LEE MOURNING
Defendant:
JOHN BROWN, HANS FRANK, MILDRED SUSAN BATEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOWNING v. SISOLAK et al
as 1:2022cv02426
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. DOWNING
Defendant:
STEVE SISOLAK and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIORITO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02341
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. FIORITO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Director MICHAEL CARVAJAL, IAN CONNOR and others
FIORITO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01172
Defendant:
BREWER, BOP GENERAL COUNSEL DOE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. FIORITO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIORITO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv03350
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, BREWER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. FIORITO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KEYS v. BARDY et al
as 1:2019cv03597
Plaintiff:
CLAY C. KEYS
Defendant:
DAVID M. BARDY, SEAN R. O'NEILL and JOHN/JANE "DOES"
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BRYANT v. WELLS FARGO BANK & CO. et al
as 1:2016cv02451
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK & COMPANY, JOHN STUMPF, STEPHEN SANGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016cv01012
Plaintiff:
DONTE ROLANDO HARRIS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., DUNBAR, JOHN & JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv01875
Plaintiff:
RALPH TAYLOR, WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS and ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., SARAH QURESHI and JOHN/ JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. NELSON et al
as 1:2013cv01663
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
THEODORE C. NELSON, JASON CALLAHAN, STEPHAN HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
