Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Williams v. Paramo et al
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Marcus Pollard, M. Hagemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Zhang et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Michael Dean
Defendant:
Dr. Zhang, Dr. Roberts, John & Jane Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. RJD CF Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
David A. Thompson
Defendant:
RJD CF Warden, James S. Hill, L. Schobelock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon Riley v. Sheriff Luna et al
as 2:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Shannon Riley
Defendant:
Sheriff Luna, John Jane Doe Deputy Sheriff and John Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nashuan Grace v. David Samuels et al
as 2:2022cv04345
Plaintiff:
Nashuan Grace
Defendant:
Warden David Samuels, David Samuels, Associate Warden John Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goode v. Canejo et al
as 3:2021cv02054
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Dennis Goode
Defendant:
J. Canejo and John & Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Avalos et al
as 3:2020cv01534
Defendant:
LT. Cardenas, William D. Gore, Sgt. Kimberly and others
Plaintiff:
Marquell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Warren v. Parsons et al
as 3:2020cv00405
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, CCII L. Garnica, CCII E. Aukerman and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carroll v. Toele et al
as 3:2020cv00079
Defendant:
C/O Meza, ., C/O Toele, Sgt. Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Joshua Jackson v. John McMahon et al
as 5:2019cv00548
Defendant:
John-Jane Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
