Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Mourning v. Gore et al
as 3:2018cv02245
Defendant:
Securus Telephone Co, John & Jane Does 1 through 10 and William Gore
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Mourning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sharp v. Jacob et al
as 3:2018cv00737
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Sharp
Defendant:
Dianne Jacob, John Doe, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Hadnot v. Riverside County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 5:2018cv00423
Defendant:
Doshier, Doshier, Jane John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hadnot
White v. Michigan, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kala B. White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, State of Michigan Department of State Police, State of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendall C. Farris v. James McDonnell et al
as 2:2018cv00049
Defendant:
Dr Richard Chang, Dr Richard Chang, Jane Doe No. 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall C. Farris
LUX EAP, LLC v. Kathleen A. Bruner et al
as 5:2017cv01359
Defendant:
Kathleen Bruner, Robert Bruner, Robert Burke and others
Plaintiff:
LUX EAP, LLC
McKay v. Board of Supervisors, John Does 1-100 et al
as 2:2017cv04563
Respondent:
Board of Supervisors, John Does 1-100, Robert Gutierrez M.D., John/Jane Does 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan McKay
McKay v. Board of Supervisors, John Does 1-100 et al
as 3:2017cv00887
Plaintiff:
Jonathan McKay
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors, John Does 1-100, Jim McDonnell, John/Jane Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Gore et al
as 3:2017cv00859
Plaintiff:
Kyle James
Defendant:
Bill Gore, Christine Harvel, Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael R. Spengler v. LASD Mental Health et al
as 2:2017cv03059
Defendant:
John Jane Does-Mental Health Dept. TTCF, LASD Mental Health, Sheriff Deputy Moses and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
