Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Whitehead, Luke v. Huffman, Katie et al
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Luke L. Whitehead
Defendant:
Katie Huffman, Srg. M. Sinclair and John/Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hoftiezer et al
as 2:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Leroy S Jones
Defendant:
Scott Hoftiezer, Julie Ludwig, Stephen Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Litscher et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Crandall Henderson
Defendant:
Jon Litscher, Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead, Luke v. Mahoney, Dave et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Luke Whitehead
Defendant:
Dave Mahoney, John/Jane Doe 1-10 and Kevin Barret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson, Victor v. McArdle, Sandra et al
as 3:2020cv00203
Defendant:
Dr. Sandra McArdle, Security Director Mark Kartman, RN Jolinda Waterman and others
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Victor Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones, Leroy v. Foster, Brian et al
as 3:2019cv00106
Defendant:
John Ruffin, Gwendlyn A. Vick, Amy Gundreson and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy S. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKee, Thomas et al v. Wierenga, S. et al
as 3:2018cv00595
Undetermined:
WCI Prison Facility
Defendant:
CPS Y. Pusich, Captain K. Tritt, CPS Ashworth and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate, Sean v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2016cv00826
Plaintiff:
Sean Tate
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham, Craig v. Montes, Michael et al
as 3:2016cv00761
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Michael Montes, Tollfreezone.com, Inc., Mydataguys.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
