Cases 41 - 50 of 403
Wallace v. Durham et al
as 3:2020cv01448
Defendant:
John Does, John H. Durham and Jane Does
Interested Party:
USA
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Wallace
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01413
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Duffy v. Lydell Jewerly Design Studio, LLC et al
as 3:2020mc00074
Defendant:
Lydell Jewerly Design Studio, LLC, Global Accessories Group, LLC and John M. Higgins
Plaintiff:
Amy Claire Duffy
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2020mc00060
Defendant:
The L.M.E. 2017 Family Trust, ABFP Management Company, LLC, Retirement Evolution Income Fund, LLC and others
Receiver:
Ryan K. Stumphauzer
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Mendez et al v. NEHDS Logistics LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00896
Defendant:
ABC Corps, NEHDS Logistics LLC and Jane & John Does
Plaintiff:
Damian Mendez, Jose Antonio Martinez Jimenez and Cristian Taveras
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00802
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Kidd
as 3:2020cv00800
Respondent:
John Thomas Reynolds and Mark McCall
Petitioner:
Robert Gordon Kidd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McCarroll v. Gill et al
as 3:2020cv00457
Defendant:
Halloran, John D. McCarroll, Charles Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret McCarroll
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Kidd
as 3:2020mc00016
Petitioner:
Robert Gordon Kidd
Respondent:
John Thomas Reynolds and Mark McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
