Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Espinoza v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv00699
Petitioner:
John C. Espinoza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Espinoza v. Top Secret Government
as 5:2018cv00651
Defendant:
Top Secret Government
Plaintiff:
John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espinoza v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center
as 5:2018cv00567
Respondent:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center
Petitioner:
John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Espinoza v. Tomson et al
as 5:2018cv00426
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Judge Ed Kinkeade, Robert Miller and others
Plaintiff:
John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Bexar County Sheriff Department
as 5:2018cv00425
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Congress of the U.S.A., etc.
as 5:2018cv00350
Defendant:
Congress of the U.S.A., etc.
Plaintiff:
John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Unnamed
as 5:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
John C. Espinoza
Defendant:
Unnamed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Hogeland
as 5:2018cv00239
Petitioner:
John C. Espinoza
Respondent:
Chief FNU Hogeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Espinoza v. City of San Antonio
as 5:2018cv00215
Defendant:
City of San Antonio
Plaintiff:
John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center et al
as 5:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Congress, Michael Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
