Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gessel v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Clane Gessel
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t - Diversity: Torts
Petty v. Kroger Company, The
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Virginia Petty
Defendant:
Kroger Company, The John Does 1-5 doing business as King Soopers Inc., Kroger Company, The doing business as King Soopers Inc. and Dillon Companies, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reed v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Larrisa Reed
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright et al v. Aspen Airport-ASE et al
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Lashawnda Wright and Bernard Myles Albury
Defendant:
Snowmass, Aspen Airport: ASE, Aspen Airport-ASE and others
Lodato v. Dillon Companies, LLC
as 1:2021cv02202
Plaintiff:
Carol Lodato
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, LLC a foreign limited liability company; and John Does 1 and 2 doing business as King Soopers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaudhary v. John Does 1 & II
as 1:2020cv01673
Plaintiff:
Noami A. Chaudhary
Defendant:
John Does 1 & II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leeling et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03551
Defendant:
Jane Doe #7, John Doe #5, Jane Doe #8 and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Leeling and Tony Leeling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole et al v. Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02325
Defendant:
MiniMed Distribution Corp., Medtronic MiniMed, Inc., John Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michele Andrea Kubas, Barry A Cole, Robert Joseph Kubas II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Advanced Career Technologies, Inc. v. John Does 1-10
as 1:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
Advanced Career Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Unfair Competition (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
