Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Holliman v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Leroy James Holliman
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc. dba Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, john Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monaco v. John Doe (1) et al
as 2:2022cv02888
Plaintiff:
Jason David Monaco
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Perry
Defendant:
Ronald Erdos, Lieutenant Fry, Officer Robert Dofflemyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cool, et al.
as 1:2022oe00037
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
William Cool, Denney, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Cool, et al.
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
William Cool, Denney, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Strickland-Saffold et al
as 1:2020cv01330
Defendant:
Atty. Justin Weatherly, Ofc. John Doe 5, Ofc. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Maiya McCoy and Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Annette Chambers-Smith, Barney and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Interested Party:
State of Ohio, Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winn v. Jane Doe #1 et al
as 1:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
Antoine Winn
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Calvin Williams, Cleveland Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv01616
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Long
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Eddy, Elliott Neufeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Doctor John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Wilder
Defendant:
Doctor John Doe #1, Doctor Orbergon, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
