Cases 11 - 20 of 126
FERRELL v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2021cv00397
Plaintiff:
LEROY FERRELL
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK INCH, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARR v. KING et al
as 1:2021cv22903
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD CHARR
Defendant:
DON KING, DON KING PRODUCTIONS, INC., EPIC SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charr v. King et al
as 0:2021cv61654
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD CHARR
Defendant:
DON KING, DON KING PRODUCTIONS, INC., EPIC SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CHARR v. DON et al
as 1:2021cv22891
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD CHARR
Defendant:
KING DON, Don King Productions, Inc., EPIC SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD et al v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL FORD and BOBBY GENE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JIMMY COKER, SGT. STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD et al v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00931
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL FORD and BOBBY GENE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JIMMY COKER, SGT. STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Ditoro et al
as 2:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Kacy Joseph
Defendant:
Z. Ditoro, M. Frost, FNU Rolon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkland et al v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
AMBER KIRKLAND and Santos McGill
Defendant:
MARK INCH, Centurion of Florida, John Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv80896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
McClurg v. Oliver et al
as 2:2021cv00381
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McClurg
Defendant:
Appel Law Group, P.A., Jeffrey E. Appel, Tonya Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
