Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company et al v. Iverson et al
as 3:2011cv02009
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company , AT&T Communications of Texas Inc , Indiana Bell Telephone Company Inc and others
Defendant:
Phil Iverson, Chris J Gose , Feature Films for Families Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Doe
as 6:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Dwyane T Wade
Defendant:
John Doe 1-50
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
NEXGEN METALS, INC. v. Depot Metals, LP et al
as 4:2009cv03925
Plaintiff:
NEXGEN METALS, INC.
Defendant:
Depot Metals, LP and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
T-Mobile USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation v. Ataricom, Inc., a Texas corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01542
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
Ataricom, Inc., a Texas corporation, Tariq Nabil Suleiman, Ruby Tariq and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
TracFone Wireless Inc v. Khoja et al
as 3:2009cv00619
Plaintiff:
TracFone Wireless Inc and TracFone Wireless Inc
Defendant:
Haider Khoja, Murad Khoja, Mehboob Khoja and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
