Cases 11 - 20 of 70
MCMILLAN v. HUGHES et al
as 1:2017cv13435
Plaintiff:
LARRY MCMILLAN
Defendant:
C. RAY HUGHES, SGT. JOHN DOE #1, SCO JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERONVIL v. JANE DOE #1 et al
as 2:2017cv08055
Plaintiff:
LEO MERONVIL
Defendant:
JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODMAN v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2017cv02427
Plaintiff:
JESSE GOODMAN
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, SHERRY YATES, RYAN O'DAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KOMIS v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv05716
Plaintiff:
JASON KOMIS
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOVIO v. O-LANO et al
as 1:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC BOVIO
Defendant:
EDWARD O-LANO, DONALD GANSKY, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINTHROP v. YATES et al
as 2:2016cv00836
Plaintiff:
PAUL WINTHROP
Defendant:
SHERRY YATES, JAMES SLAUGHTER, ANNIE MOTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv05201
Plaintiff:
JESSICA C. GRAHAM
Defendant:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. BARNES et al
as 3:2013cv03347
Plaintiff:
RONALD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JIM BARNES, CHARLES E. BARNES JR., GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASSENAAR v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2013cv01485
Plaintiff:
RICKY KURT WASSENAAR
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, MICHELLE RICCI, BENARD GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCKLEY v. NEW PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPT et al
as 2:2012cv05276
Plaintiff:
TOM BUCKLEY
Defendant:
NEW PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPT, TYPIST JAN DOE, PUBLIC DEFENDER MR. GOLDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
