Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Almanza v. Pastupaka et al
as 1:2023cv15665
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Almanza
Defendant:
Artyom Pastupaka, John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Naperville Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
Nequan Vaughn
Defendant:
Naperville Police Department, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2022cv06685
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lee
Defendant:
John Doe #1, #2 John Doe, Lt. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah El v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv50387
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
Makala Frazier, Brad Cars, Lance Reinbolz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
National Van Lines, Inc. v. National Van Lines Group et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
National Van Lines Inc
Defendant:
National Van Lines Group, John Doe Company #1, John Doe Company #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Cole v. Dixon Correctinal Center Staff Members et al
as 1:2021cv04402
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cole
Defendant:
Dixon Correctinal Center Staff Members, C/O Simpson, C/O Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ranft v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2020cv50457
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Devin L Schafer, Christine McClimons and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Ranft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Kester et al
as 3:2020cv50266
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe 7, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02975
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollis v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2020cv01971
Defendant:
John Doe #5, Rob Jeffreys, Sgt. Mayz and others
Plaintiff:
Marte Hollis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
