Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Iraheta v. Doe (1) et al
as 4:2024cv01163
Plaintiff: Jose D. Iraheta
Defendant: John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Abraugh v. Altimus We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-30205
Defendant / Appellee: Bradley Vassar, individually & in his official capacity, John Doe #1, Correctional Employee, Bill Altimus, individually & in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kelsey Rice Abraugh, Reashelle Morrow, on behalf of M A and Karen Abraugh, individually and on behalf of M A and as Administrator, on behalf of Randall Abraugh Estate
June Med Svcs v. Phillips We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-30001
Plaintiff / Appellee: June Medical Services, L.L.C., on behalf of its patients, physicians, and staff, doing business as Hope Medical Group for Women, John Doe 2, M.D., John Doe 1, M.D. and others
Defendant / Appellant: Courtney Phillips, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Jeff Landry, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Louisiana and James E. Stewart, Sr., in his official capacity as District Attorney for Caddo Parish
Appellee: John Doe 5 and Leroy Brinkley
McClure v. Martinez
as 20-11102
Plaintiff / Appellant: Robert Troy McClure
Defendant / Appellee: Bryan Luna, Lieutenant, Montford Unit, John Doe, Correctional Officer, Montford Unit, John Doe, #4, Use of Force Team, Montford Unit and others
Alexander Coltart v. State of Texas, et al
as 20-50763
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alexander Scott Coltart
Defendant / Appellee: Doctor FNU Lemonte, Olsson LNU, Mareth LNU and others
Doe 1 et al v. Al-Qaeda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00681
Plaintiff: John Doe 3, John Doe 1, John Doe 7 and others
Defendant: The Taliban, The Haqqani Network and Al-Qaeda
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
June Medical Services, L.L.C., et al v. Rebekah Gee, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-30982
Plaintiff / Appellee: JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES, L.L.C., on behalf of its patients, physicians, and staff, doing business as Hope Medical Group for Women, JOHN DOE 1, Medical Doctor, JOHN DOE 3, Medical Doctor and others
Defendant / Appellant: REBEKAH GEE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, JEFF LANDRY, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Louisiana and JAMES E. STEWART, SR., in his official capacity as District Attorney for Caddo Parish
Rebekah Gee, et alIn re: Rebekah Gee, et al
as 19-30953
Respondent: JOHN DOE 2, M.D., JOHN DOE 3, M.D., JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES, L.L.C., On Behalf of Its Patients, Physicians, and Staff, doing business as Hope Medical Group for Women and others
Petitioner: JAMES E. STEWART, SR., In His Official Capacity as District Attorney for Caddo Parish, JEFF LANDRY, In His Official Capacity as Louisiana Attorney General and In re: REBEKAH GEE, In Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health
In re: Rebekah Gee, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-30353
Petitioner: JAMES E. STEWART, SR., in his official capacity as District Attorney for Caddo Parish and In re: REBEKAH GEE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health
Respondent: JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES, L.L.C., on behalf of its patients, physicians, and staff, doing business as Hope Medical Group for Women, JOHN DOE 3, Doctor, on behalf of themselves and their patients and JOHN DOE 1, Doctor, on behalf of themselves and their patients
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?